These are various writings on Green (Evnironmental) Issues:
Section (click) | The principle it espouses |
---|---|
ToR.1 The eventual 60% Target | The necessity of achieving the 60% reduction and how that should be reflected in all policy. The key principle. |
ToR.2 Aspirations of Less Developed Nations | People in 'less developed nations' aspire to our way of living. To 'make poverty history' might be self-defeating unless we urgently set the example of CCE reduction now. |
Q2.1 Problems with Relying on Technological Advance | Technology seldom delivers all its early promise nor what the early adopters expect. So it is unwise to rely on technology to achieve a 60% reduction. |
Q5.1 On Signals and Example-setting | We in the U.K. must set an example, and give clear signals that we mean business. |
Q6.1 A comment on ETS | Some reasons why Emissions Trading Schemes are likely to be counter-productive. |
Q7.1 How to calculate targets | Targets tend to get missed (e.g. the U.K.'s target of 20% will be 30% out). So take this tendency into account and set more stringent targets. |
Q7.2 Targets should be plan-led, not demand-led | If we predict demand and provide for it, our climate change emissions will rocket. |
Q8.1 Lifestyle: Ways of Living and Working | Our lifestyle -assumptions, habits, expectations and aspirations - is the real problem. We must change them. This Programme ignores this important issue. |
Q9.1 Ensure Measures do not Mislead | We in the UK seem to be meeting our Kyoto targets - but only by shifting emissions to other parts of the world. Our measures should be for global, not UK, reductions. |
Q9.2 An Integrated Approach | Climate change is not the only environmental problem we face. |
Q9.3 Attitude and Responsibility | We should show a attitude of responsibility, not of competition or defensiveness. |
S6.1 Additional Preliminary Comment on Energy | This section should focus on energy use, not energy supply. Reduce use, and then supply will reduce too. |
S7.1 Additional Comment: Indirect Impacts and Pull-Through | It's all very well making business processes more efficient. But if more products or services are sought, then the total emissions will still rise. We must recognise indirect pull-through effects. |
S8.1 Additional Comment: Questioning Mobility and Demand for Travel | The government assumes we need mobility for a prosperous economy. We do not. We must cut mobility. |
Q28.1 Transport: A Deceitful, Misleading Section | The only figure in this section has a large 'lie factor'. And the important issues are studiously avoided. Why? |
Q29.1 Fuel Duty Escalator | The fuel duty escalator was making a significant contribution to reducing road use. It sent an important signal. But it was scrapped for political reasons. |
Q33.1 Aviation | Air transport is even worse than the car. Yet flights are being encouraged. Why? |
S12.1 Measurements and Structural Mechanisms r.t. Actions | We need action, not merely measurement. |
S12.2 Global Adaptation | 200 million refugees are likely when climate change really gets going; what are we going to do with them? |
Q51.1 Stakeholder-led Adaptation, Enforcement and Leadership | The government should lead. |
OC.1 Religion and Theology of Climate Change | Religion is important to most parts of the world outside Europe; we need a theology of climate change. |
Copyright (c) Andrew Basden 2005.
Created: 17 April 2005. Last updated: 6 January 2006 uktptstrategy link. 7 September 2008 wind. 26 September 2008 modernity rant. 19 October 2009 corrected link. 7 December 2009 frodsham. 16 May 2011 broken link to andrew repaired. 15 September 2014 renamed index-110516.