Navigation: This page 'kgsvr.net/andrew/opinions/met.police.html'
---> List of Opinion pages ---> Main Home Page ---> Author. About page. Send comments. Contact.

Is the Met "Institutionally Racist"?

Is the Metropolitan Police (the Met) "Institutionally Racist"? No. Does it have a toxic culture? Yes - and this is worse. (This is an issue that has been discussed in the UK over the past decade.)

I find it useful to separate out the various aspects of reality that are relevant to this, and especially using the aspects suggested by the Dutch philosopher Herman Dooyeweerd. He distinguished fifteen irreducibly distinct ways in which human reality functions, ranging from mathematical, natural, cognitive, social and societal aspect. The final three, the societal ones, impact all we do. They are:

The ethical and pistic aspects are those that operate deeply, invisibly, in the human heart and in what we call culture. They impact all we do, say and think - e.g. by hidden agendas versus openness, generosity versus meanness. A toxic culture is usually found when the people with influence are selfish and they idolize some aim, aspect or artefact at the expense of all else, being willing to sacrifice all else for it, including the welfare and wellbeing of those 'under' them.

The Met was pervaded by a toxic culture in which both their ethical and pistic aspects were dysfunctional. Ethical aspect: They operated with an attitude of self-protection and also some rivalry with other forces - wanting to be the biggest and best. Pistic aspect: They operated with a deliberately-chosen, politically-inpsired mindset of, for example, treating environmental activists as almost like terrorists (and thus infiltrating them, living a lie by maintaining false marriage-like partnership with activists - the scandal a dozen years ago). That the Met trained with the Army gave them the a mindset-flavour that people are enemies rather than citizens. They believed they were superior to those they were supposed to be serving, and glorified things that come with that, such as violence and misogyny (in the Clapham Police, 2025). Racism tends to be pervasive in such a culture, and those who stand up for decency tend to be laughed at, vilified, shouted down and even hindered in getting promotion.

To in "institutionally racist" is about instituion, which is not the same as culture but is meaningful in the juridical aspect. It would be so if the rules by which the members of the Met operated were racist. To be institutionally racist therefore means that the rules by which they operate (including the law of the land) discriminated against certain races of people. Apart from a minority of rules, this does not seem to be the case.

Dysfunctional culture is worse than being institutionally racist or anything else, because it is the culture that spreads derogatorily rather than by logic or argument, and gives a nasty, vicious flavour to all that is done.

That is what the Commissioner of the Met has to contend with. But his masters in the Government do not seem to recognise the difference, focusing too much on the juridical and ignoring the aspects of self-giving love and true faith and commitment.

See Also


To send comments, queries, etc. please email me. The email should contain two parts, separated by the "at" character in the usual way. The first part should be "messages". The second part should be the domain, "kgsvr.net".

Thank you. This will send an email to me, to which I will endeavour to respond.


About This Page

This page, 'http://kgsvr.net/andrew/opinions/met.police.html', is an Opinion Page put up by Andrew Basden that aim to stimulate ideas for discussion. Contact details.

Copyright (c) Andrew Basden at all the dates below. But you may use this material subject to certain conditions.

Written on the Amiga with Protext in the style of classic HTML.

Created: 2 October 2025. Last updated: